I don't know how useful these projects of mine are, but I thought to begin to collect the wisdom of the internet, get the tone of the internet regarding people potentially running as democrat for president in 2028. I really don't want JD Vance or Marco Rubio.
Mark Kelly: Military, astronaut, typical hero for our grandparents generation. Wife was shot, he's made sacrifices. He's been fighting Trump actively with a social media presence. He's a white man, Dems need to try that on for size to make sure this next election isn't fumbled. Hopefully the voters don't want to continue to blow the fucking world up. I'm sure he'd be better than any republican.
Knock: He's too pro-police (skeet) to get 90% of the black vote? After electing a white man because America didn't like the brown woman, not sure that's a tipping point problem.
Gavin Newsom: He's governor of California, a strong state, and has fought Trump in the social media quite well. People who hate him don't always articulate why, which proves much of our choices are unconscious. I'm sure he'd be better than any republican.
Knock: Too centrist. He's got the hackles up for some, he makes people feel betrayed who have unrealistic expectations. "He is the epitome of what's wrong with CA. Slick talker full of bad ideas who thinks he's right." (skeet).
Kamala Harris: Just keep running till you win, that's every politicians strategy. That's what Biden did. Some think she's too establishment, some think she's too revolutionary. Must be a middle of the road person. Seems cool to me, likes jazz and lived in Madison for a year, where I grew up, but America doesn't get her. Did well despite the limitations of 107 day campaign. I'm sure she's be better than any republican.
Knock: Most withdrawn of all the candidates, least charismatic. Their racism and misogyny is complicated. (skeet)
AOC is good and dynamic, but America doesn't want a woman or an ethnic woman at that. She's got solid fundraising ability with Bernie Sanders. She's a good talking head. I'm sure she'd be way better than any republican.
Knock: Too left wing. There are lots of centrists who dislike ideology.
Pete Buttigig is gay, and that's yet another reason not to vote for someone who's politics you hate, and we need to bring in the swing voters. I wish we were past homophobia, but it's obviously a persistent factor in the USA in 2025. My friend came out to me at 16, in a state where the average age of coming out was 22. I probably have a positive prejudice with the gays. America doesn't. He'd be better than any republican.
Knock: Too centrist? He's a nuts and bolts policy wonk, I think he'd be a great president, but what Obama taught us was that if there's a huge resistance, in his case to his race, then it's just all uphill battles. He seems strong enough to weather the storms. We need a white hetrosexual man. Again, either you're too ideological or you're too centrist, there's no sweet spot.
Pritzker is fighting Trump, for me the next president should have put in effort of resistance. He's a white hetrosexual man! But he's not attractive. We need a basic level of looks in superficial America. He'd be better than any republican.
Knock: He's too rich to be a true revolutionary? He's not handsome enough? Same criticism bunch of not being enough left wing, or not centrist enough. The irrational fear is he will tax people more.
Cory Booker. I'd love a vegan president. He'd be better than any republican.
Knock: Not white enough. Too friendly with Wall Street. Too much into uniting. You need pundits to believe in your political lane.
Jimmy Carter. Yea, I know he's dead, he's a placeholder for someone who seems to come out of nowhere. Like the guy from Maryland. The other candidates take all the shit flinging and then a new one steps forward without any shit on them. That's why I hoped Harris would win. Didn't work because she's not a white hetrosexual Christian male, which seems to be category needs for superficial America.